VOLUME 2                                                   SPRING 2022                                                 ISSUE 1

The Syin & Sern Law Review



Nathalia M Fenwick *

Click on icon and download PDF


To be updated. 


Privacy is one of the biggest assets of an individual and our constitution recognizes it as a fundamental right under Article 21. However, this right to privacy can be breached for bigger concerns such as larger public interest or friendly relations with other states. In a market, data plays a vital role as enterprises collect and use this data for varied core activities without which they might not be able to survive. This in turn makes the enterprises abuse the data collected and engage in anti-competitive behaviour.  So, questions arise as to what extent can a person’s data be utilized? Does competition law have the right to regulate anti-competitive behaviour? And do consumers have the right to decide what information must be shared and what must not. The research paper analyses various aspects of data infringement and how competition law can effectively regulate the breach of privacy by cooperating with other regulators such as the consumer law authorities so as to maintain harmony among all the regulators and yet protect individuals’ privacy.

©2021 The Author(s). Published by Syin & Sern on behalf of the Syin & Sern Law Review. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


* Ms. Nathalia M Fenwick is a final-year law undergraduate from Sandip University.

[1] K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2018) 4 SCC 651.

[1] Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage Companies v State of Bihar, 2016 (4) PLJR 369.

[1] Competition Law and Data, Bundeskartellamt and Autorité de la concurrence,  (2016).

[1] Professor  Pinar Akman at el, International perspectives on privacy and competition law, ABA BUSINESS LAW SECTION, (2021), https://researchmap.jp/kentaro_hiryama/presentations/33814442/attachment_file.pdf.

[1] Unlocking digital competition, Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel, (2019).

[1] A critique of consent in information privacy, THE CENTRE OF INTERNET AND SOCIETY, (Dec 21, 2022, 12:37 pm), https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/a-critique-of-consent-in-information-privacy.

[1] Katherine Kemp, Concealed Data Practices and Competition Law; Why Privacy matters, 16 EUROPEAN LAW COMM (2020), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441056.2020.1839228.

[1] Purushottam Kittane et al, Data privacy standards issued in India- Legal compliance or new brand differentiator, 11 NATIONAL LAW REVIEW, (2021) https://www.natlawreview.com/article/data-privacy-standards-issued-india-legal-compliance-or-new-brand-differentiator.

[1]Bundeskartellamt v. Facebook, case KVR 69/19.

[1] Competition Act, 2000, S. 4, Act of Parliament, 2000, (India).

[1]  Matrimony.com ltd v. Google LLC & Ors, Case no. Of 07 of 2012.

[1] Information Technology Act, 2000, Sec 43A, Act of Parliament, (2000), India.

[1] Information Technology Act, 2000, Sec 72A, Act of Parliament (2000), India.

[1] Anurag Vaishnav, The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2021, all you need to know, PRSINDIA, (Oct 20, 2021, 5:22 PM), https://www.prsindia.org/theprsblog/personal-data-protection-bil019-all-you-need-know.

[1] Non- Personal Data Governance Framework, PRSINDIA, (Dec 22, 2021, 9: 41 pm), https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/non-personal-data-governance-framework.

[1] Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta v. WhatsApp Inc, [2017] 142 SCL 283 (CCI).

[1] MM Sharma, WhatsApp's new data privacy policy in India- CCI to investigation to continue?  Delhi High Court Refuses to entertain, MONDAQ, (Dec 23, 2021, 9: 25 pm), https://www.mondaq.com/india/privacy-protection/1083020/whatsapp39s-new-data-privacy-policy-in-india-cci-investigation-to-continue-delhi-high-court-refuses-to-intervene.

[1] Competition Act, 2002, S. 4, Act of Parliament, 2002 (India).

[1] Competition Act, 2002, S. 26(1), Act of Parliament, 2002 (India).

[1]CCI v. Bharti Airtel, (2019) 2 SCC 521.

[1] Monsanto Holdings Private Limited v. CCI, 2020 (82) PTC 559 (Del).

[1] Competition Act, 2002, S. 4(2), Act of Parliament, 2002 (India).

[1] Roger Van Den Beegh, Franziska Weber, ‘'The German Facebook Saga: Abuse of Dominance or Abuse of Competition law?, 44, World Competition, Issue 1, pp. 29-52, (2021), https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/World+Competition/44.1/WOCO2021003.

[1] Mergers: Commission approved acquisition of LinkedIn by Microsoft with remedies, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (Oct 25, 2021, 12: 41 pm), .

[1] Marco Botta & Klaus Wiedemann, The interaction of EU commission, consumer, and data protection law in the digital economy, https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X19863590.

[1] Anne Federale & Constance Eckhardt, The interplay of data protection and competition law, BIRD AD BIRD, (Dec 20, 3:25 pm), https://www.twobirds.com/en/news/articles/2019/global/the-interplay-of-data-protection-and-competition-law-issues-beyond-the-facebook-case.

[1] Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, Act of Parliament 1992 (India).

[1] Companies Act, 1956, S. 390-395, Act of Parliament 1956, (India).

[1] Competition Act, 2002, S. 5, Act of Parliament 2002, (India).

[1] European Data Protection Supervisor publishes opinion on Big Data and Enforcement of Fundamental Rights; Emphasizes Concern Over Data Monopolies, LEXOLOGY, (Dec 22, 2021, 1: 54 pm), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=02c11bcd-a42e-4742-ac5a-fdcf417df7aa.